Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Acceleration,Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimming,Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks Table 1 shows that AlexNet can be pruned to 1/9 of its original size without impacting accuracy, and the amount of computation can be reduced by 3. pruning than it is to re-initialize the pruned layers. from computer vision, . The quality of your consciousness at this moment is what shapes the future. Deep learning with cots hpc systems. Almost all parameters are between [0.015,0.015]. Han, S.; Pool, J.; Tran, J.; and Dally, W. 2015. Energy table for 45nm process, Stanford VLSI wiki. . 5)L2 outperforms L1 after retraining, since there is no benefit to further pushing values towards zero. Babak Hassibi, David G Stork, et al. three-step method. Yann LeCun, Leon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. HashedNets [20] is a recent technique to reduce model sizes by using a hash function to randomly group connection weights into hash buckets, so that all connections within the same hash bucket share a single parameter value. dataset, our method reduced the number of parameters of AlexNet by a factor of However, comparing the yellow and green lines shows that L2 outperforms L1 after retraining, since there is no benefit to further pushing values towards zero. In trained neural networks, both the weights and activations are binary. Han SongDeep CompressionDeep Compression These approximation and quantization techniques are orthogonal to network pruning, and they can be used together to obtain further gains, There have been other attempts to reduce the number of parameters of neural networks by replacing the fully connected layer with global average pooling. Following a similar methodology, we aggressively pruned both convolutional and fully-connected layers to realize a significant reduction in the number of weights, shown in Table5. 13x, from 138 million to 10.3 million, again with no loss of accuracy. Running a 1 billion connection neural network, for example, at 20Hz would require (20Hz)(1G)(640pJ) = 12.8W just for DRAM access well beyond the power envelope of a typical mobile device. Figure 4 shows the sparsity pattern of the first fully connected layer of LeNet-300-100, the matrix size is 784300. Data-free parameter pruning for deep neural networks. So when we retrain the pruned layers, we should keep the surviving parameters instead of re-initializing them. Vincent Vanhoucke, Andrew Senior, and MarkZ Mao. The weight is from the first fully connected layer of AlexNet. For a convolution neural network (CNN), the kernel weights have both sparse and low-rank properties 33. In, Emily L Denton, Wojciech Zaremba, Joan Bruna, Yann LeCun, and Rob Fergus. Close. We also experimented with probabilistically pruning parameters based on their absolute value, but this gave worse results. LeSong, and Ziyu Wang. transmission of mobile applications incorporating DNNs. Google Scholar; Chollet, F. 2016. In. First, we train the network to learn which connections are For each layer of the network the table shows (left to right) the original number of weights, the number of floating point operations to compute that layers activations, the average percentage of activations that are non-zero, the percentage of non-zero weights after pruning, and the percentage of actually required floating point operations. Min Lin, Qiang Chen, and Shuicheng Yan. S Han, J Pool, J Tran, W Dally. It has 28 bands, each bands width 28, corresponding to the 28 28 input pixels. important connections. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '14); 11-12 December 2014; Montreal; 2014. pp. Previous Chapter Next Chapter. [21] and Weinberger et al. For embedded mobile applications, these resource demands become prohibitive. An interesting byproduct is that network pruning detects visual attention regions. Yunchao Gong, Liu Liu, Ming Yang, and Lubomir Bourdev. [1]Han, Song, et al. 2015 . Figure[7] shows that AlexNet can be pruned to 1/9 of its original size without impacting accuracy, and the amount of computation can be reduced by 3. line at 80% (5 pruning) pruned to 8. We have presented a method to improve the energy efficiency and storage of neural networks without affecting accuracy by finding the right connections. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. Figure 1 shows the energy cost of basic arithmetic and memory operations in a 45nm CMOS process. experiments with VGG-16 found that the number of parameters can be reduced by However, unlike the brain mechanisms, most existing SNN algorithms have fixed network topologies and connection relationships. Salakhutdinov. This is further discussed in experiment section. Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks Song Han Jeff Pool Stanford University NVIDIA songhan@stanford.edu jpool@nvidia.com arXiv:1506.02626v3 [cs.NE] 30 Oct . Caffe was modified to add a mask which Whysoftware energy efficiency metricsare needed? Our goal in pruning networks is to reduce the energy . The data tells us that the energy per connection is dominated by memory access and ranges from 5pJ for 32 bit coefficients in on-chip SRAM to 640pJ for 32bit coefficients in off-chip DRAM. The CONV layers (on the left) are more sensitive to pruning than the fully connected layers (on the right). Choosing the correct regularization impacts the performance of pruning and retraining. Figure[9] shows the sparsity pattern of the first fully connected layer of LeNet-300-100, the matrix size is 784 300. Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, The network as a whole has been reduced to 7.5% of its original size (13 smaller). 1135 . To address these limitations, we describe a On the ImageNet dataset, our method reduced the number of parameters of AlexNet by a factor of 9, from 61 million to 6.7 million, without incurring accuracy loss. [22], sparsity will minimize hash collision making feature hashing even more effective. As the parameters get sparse, the classifier will select the most informative predictors and thus have much less prediction variance, which reduces over-fitting. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Figure[13] shows histograms of weight distribution before (left) and after (right) pruning. CNNs contain fragile co-adapted features [24]: gradient descent is able to find a good solution when the network is initially trained, but not after re-initializing some layers and retraining them. Maxwell D Collins and Pushmeet Kohli. Abstract. After pruning connections, neurons with zero input connections or zero output connections may be safely pruned. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network. Thus, the retraining time is less a concern. An early approach to pruning was biased weight decay [17]. Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. From the plot results show that: 1) Both CONV and FC layers can be pruned, but with different sensitivity. Abstract: Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Network -- . We use the AlexNet Caffe model as the reference model, which has 61 million parameters across 5 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers. We further examine the performance of pruning on the ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 dataset, which has 1.2M training examples and 50k validation examples. Memory bounded deep convolutional networks. Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi. The biggest gain comes from iterative pruning (solid red line with solid circles). Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NIPS 2015), Song Han, Jeff Pool, John Tran, William Dally. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Similar Quantization and Huffman Coding, Exploring Sparsity in Recurrent Neural Networks, DSD: Dense-Sparse-Dense Training for Deep Neural Networks, Training highly effective connectivities within neural networks with trained quantization and huffman coding. Our method prunes redundant connections using a three-step method. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. Finally, we retrain the network to fine tune the weights of the remaining connections. The VGG-16 results are, like those for AlexNet, very promising. Copyright 2022 ACM, Inc. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural networks, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. randomly initialized, fixed weights, Learning Neural Network Architectures using Backpropagation, DecomposeMe: Simplifying ConvNets for End-to-End Learning, FreezeNet: Full Performance by Reduced Storage Costs. large networks so they can run in real time on mobile devices. Due to a planned power outage, our services will be reduced today (June 15) starting at 8:30am PDT until the work is complete. neural network architectures. 13x, from 138 million to 10.3 million, again with no loss of accuracy. The result is that the parameters form a bimodal distribution and become more spread across the x-axis, between [0.025,0.025]. Peter huttenlocher (1931-2013). This problem is noted by Szegedy, Network pruning has been used both to reduce network complexity [PDF] Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural 2) The experiments on AlexNet and VGGNet on ImageNet, showed that both fully connected layer and convolutional layer can be pruned, reducing the number of connections by 9 to 13 without loss of . We used the sensitivity results to find each layers threshold: for example, the smallest threshold was applied to the most sensitive layer, which is the first convolutional layer. This paper proposes a method to jointly learn network connections and link weights simultaneously. , where synapses are created in the first few months of a childs development, followed by gradual pruning of little-used connections, falling to typical adult values. In dropout, each parameter is probabilistically dropped during training, but will come back during inference. Because digits are written in the center of the image, these are the important parameters. to further reduce network complexity. PyTorch Implementation of Deep Compression, Neural networks have become ubiquitous in applications ranging To add evaluation results you first need to, Papers With Code is a free resource with all data licensed under, add a task Optimal brain damage. Finally, we retrain the network to fine tune the weights of the remaining connections. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? The weight connections of the NNs holds the real ability for the NNs model to efficient performance. Pages 1135-1143. Parameters from one mode do not adapt well to the other. Running a 1 billion connection neural network, for example, at 20Hz would require (20 H z) (1 G) (640 p J) = 12.8 W just for DRAM access - well beyond the power envelope of a typical mobile device. This occurs due to gradient descent and regularization. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. The more parameters pruned away, the less the accuracy. After pruning, the network is retrained with 1/10 of the original networks original learning rate. 2. The final step retrains the network to learn the final weights for the remaining sparse connections. If your mind carries a heavy burden of past, you will experience more of the same. Proc. The original AlexNet took 75 hours to train on NVIDIA Titan X GPU. Song Han, Jeff Pool, +1 author. BNNs achieved near state-of-the-art results on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN. dataset, our method reduced the number of parameters of AlexNet by a factor of Large networks do not fit in on-chip storage and hence require the more costly DRAM accesses. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before . Read the original paper:https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02626, In this blog post, we willtalk aboutidentifying data deduplications break-even point (a threshold) that separates the cases when it is worth or not deduplicating data from an energy or performance perspective. L1 regularization gives better accuracy than L2 directly after pruning (dotted blue and purple lines) since it pushes more parameters closer to zero. Large networks do not fit in on-chip storage and hence require the more costly DRAM accesses. 9x, from 61 million to 6.7 million, without incurring accuracy loss. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1135-1143, 2015. 4) Such pruning method can be targeted for fixed-function hardware specialized for sparse DNN, given the limitation of general purpose hardware on sparse computation. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. After pruning the large center region is removed. Compressing deep convolutional networks using vector quantization. Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. compensate for the connections that have been removed. The AlexNet Caffe model achieved a top-1 accuracy of 57.2% and a top-5 accuracy of 80.3%. Our method, motivated in part by how learning works in the mammalian brain, operates by learning which connections are important, pruning the Comparing biases for minimal network construction with back-propagation. The Network in Network architecture [15] and GoogLenet [16], achieves state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks by adopting this idea. We are targeting our pruning method for fixed-function hardware specialized for sparse DNN, given the limitation of general purpose hardware on sparse computation. all 7. Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. The result is that the parameters form a bimodal distribution and become more spread across the x-axis, between [0.025, 0.025]. Our pruning method employs a three-step process, as illustrated in Figure 3, Second order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal brain surgeon. . ArXiv. All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Part of Feature hashing for large scale multitask learning. Second order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal brain surgeon. Data-free parameter pruning for deep neural networks. This step is critical. Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. The following observations can get from the plot: 1)The more parameters pruned away, the less the accuracy. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. We believe this accuracy improvement is due to pruning finding the right capacity of the network and hence reducing overfitting. 2.Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural networks; 3.Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural 4.README.md - GitHub; 5.Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks; 6. order of magnitude without affecting their accuracy by learning only the . Similar . Authors are asked to consider this carefully and discuss it with their co-authors prior to requesting a name change in the electronic proceedings. A common methodology for inducing sparsity in weights and activations is calledpruning. Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. The pruning results is showed on Figure[8]. However, these extraordinary performances are at the expense of high computational and storage demand. Neuronal mechanisms of developmental plasticity in the cat's visual system. It took 173 hours to retrain the pruned AlexNet. Here are the steps how to start to prune a network. Chen. The model size reduction from pruning also facilitates storage and making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. Learning the right connections is an iterative process. In. Because digits are written in the center of the image, these are the important parameters. experiments with VGG-16 found that the number of parameters can be reduced by 5432. Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. Improving the speed of neural networks on cpus. 2015. Song Han, Huizi Mao, and William J Dally. Next, we prune the unimportant connections. Two green points achieve slightly better accuracy than the original model. Deep learning and convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) have been The two panels have different y-axis scales. Learning both Weights and . Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. Yunchao Gong, Liu Liu, Ming Yang, and Lubomir Bourdev. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. Pruning is not used when iteratively prototyping the model, but rather used for model reduction when the model is ready for deployment. Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. back-propagation. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. Next, we prune the unimportant connections. "Recently, much activity in the deep-learning community has been directed toward development of efficient neural-network architectures for computationally constrained platforms," says Hartwig Adam, the team lead for mobile vision at Google. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. - Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks . Kilian Weinberger, Anirban Dasgupta, John Langford, Alex Smola, and Josh Attenberg. Do not remove: This comment is monitored to verify that the site is working properly, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NIPS 2015). We then retrain the sparse network so the remaining connections can It's free to sign up and bid on jobs. LeNet-5 is a convolutional network that has two convolutional layers and two fully connected layers, which achieves 0.8% error rate on MNIST. While these large neural networks are very powerful, their size consumes considerable storage, memory bandwidth, and computational resources. A method to reduce the storage and computation required by neural networks by an order of magnitude without affecting their accuracy by learning only the important connections, and prunes redundant connections using a three-step method. The first convolutional layer, which interacts with the input image directly, is most sensitive to pruning. To address these limitations, we describe a method to reduce the storage and computation required by neural networks by an order of magnitude . Figure 7 shows histograms of weight distribution before (left) and after (right) pruning. After pruning, the neural network finds the center of the image more important, and the connections to the peripheral regions are more heavily pruned. Compressing neural networks with the hashing trick. Although studies in the past have shown that more convolutional kernels help to achieve better performance, visualization of the model can be obscured by the use of many kernels, resulting in overfitting and reduced interpretation . 3)Converts a dense, fully-connected layer to a sparse layer. The second step is to prune the low-weight connections. Our goal in pruning networks is to reduce the energy required to run such Deep learning methods, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved remarkable performances in many fields, such as computer vision, natural language processing and speech recognition. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. Almost all parameters are between [0.015, 0.015]. Edit social preview. LeNet-300-100 is a fully connected network with two hidden layers, with 300 and 100 neurons each, which achieves 1.6% error rate on MNIST. Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks (Research Paper Walkthrough) [D] Discussion. As pointed out in Shi et al. For each layer of the network the table shows (left to right) the original number of weights, the number of floating point operations to compute that layers activations, the average percentage of activations that are non-zero, the percentage of non-zero weights after pruning, and the percentage of actually required floating point operations. Also, neural networks are prone to suffer the vanishing gradient problem. Unlike conventional training, however, we are not learning the nal values of the weights, but rather we are learning which connections are important. Kilian Weinberger, Anirban Dasgupta, John Langford, Alex Smola, and Josh Our method prunes redundant connections using a three-step method. LeNet- 300-100 is a fully connected network with two hidden layers, with 300 and 100 neurons each, which achieves 1.6% error rate on MNIST. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. The network parameters and accuracy 1 before and after pruning are shown in Figure[4]. Use the "Report an Issue" link to request a name change. Also, conventional Yaniv Taigman, Ming Yang, MarcAurelio Ranzato, and Lior Wolf. Neural networks are both computationally intensive and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. Advances in neural information processing systems 28. , 2015. Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi. To address these limitations, we describe a method to reduce the storage and computation required by neural networks by an order of . While these large neural networks are very powerful, their size consumes considerable storage, memory bandwidth, and computational resources. Similarly, CONV layer indices can be represented with only 8 bits. 1. connections cpu . For operation, contemporary convolutional networks typically use high precision ( 32-bit) neurons and synapses to provide continuous derivatives and support small incremental changes to network state, both formally required for backpropagation-based gradient learning.In comparison, neuromorphic designs can use one-bit spikes to provide event-based computation and communication (consuming . To address these limitations, we describe a This is time-consuming and can lead to suboptimal pruning. 6)The biggest gain comes from iterative pruning. This leads to smaller memory capacity and bandwidth requirements for real-time image processing, making it easier to be deployed on mobile systems. ABSTRACT. 2016] Song Han, Xingyu Liu, Huizi Mao, Jing Pu, Ardavan Pedram, Mark A Horowitz, and William J Dally. Four representative networks were pruned: Lenet-300-100 and Lenet-5 on MNIST, together with AlexNet and VGG-16 on ImageNet. Also, conventional networks fix the architecture before training starts; as a result, training cannot improve the architecture. making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems. 2) The experiments on AlexNet and VGGNet on ImageNet, showed that both fully connected layer and convolutional layer can be pruned, reducing the number of connections by 9 to 13 without loss of accuracy.